HashMap vs Hashtable
- In Java, both HashMap and Hashtable are utilized to store key-value pairs in a collection, and both implement the Map interface.
- In spite of their likenesses, there are key contrasts that can impact which one to select for a particular situation.
- Understanding these contrasts is vital for making the correct choice based on execution necessities, thread safety, and information management needs.
Key Points of Difference:
1.Synchronization:
- HashMap isn’t synchronized by default, making it unacceptable for multi-threaded situations unless expressly synchronized externally.
- Hashtable is synchronized, meaning as it were one thread can access a method at a time, which makes it thread-safe but at the cost of execution.
2.Null Keys/Values:
- HashMap permits null keys and null values, making it more flexible once you got to store these values.
- Hashtable does not permit null keys or null values. Attempting to insert null into a Hashtable comes about in a NullPointerException.
3.Performance:
- HashMap is regularly speedier than Hashtable in most cases since it doesn’t have the overhead of synchronization.
- Hashtable is slower due to its synchronization mechanism, which makes a bottleneck when numerous threads attempt to get to the table concurrently.
4.Iterator vs. Enumeration:
- HashMap uses an Iterator that’s fail-fast. In case the map is altered whereas iterating, it throws a ConcurrentModificationException.
- Hashtable uses an Enumeration to repeat through its components, which isn’t fail-fast and does not throw exceptions for concurrent adjustments.
5.Thread Safety:
- HashMap isn’t thread-safe by default, and developers have to manage synchronization in case utilizing it in a multi-threaded environment.
- Then again, ConcurrentHashMap can be utilized for thread security in modern Java.
- Hashtable is thread-safe, but its utilize is presently disheartened in favor of more productive options like ConcurrentHashMap or Collections.synchronizedMap.
Example Code for HashMap and Hashtable:
HashMap Example:
import java.util.*;
public class HashMapExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
HashMap<String, Integer> map = new HashMap<>();
map.put("Apple", 10);
map.put("Banana", 20);
System.out.println("HashMap: " + map);
// Retrieve value
System.out.println("Value for Apple: " + map.get("Apple"));
// Null values and keys allowed
map.put(null, 30); // Null key
map.put("Grapes", null); // Null value
System.out.println("HashMap with Nulls: " + map);
}
}
Hashtable Example:
import java.util.*;
public class HashtableExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Hashtable<String, Integer> table = new Hashtable<>();
table.put("Apple", 10);
table.put("Banana", 20);
System.out.println("Hashtable: " + table);
// Throws NullPointerException if null key or value is inserted
// table.put(null, 30); // Uncommenting this line will cause an exception
// table.put("Grapes", null); // Uncommenting this line will cause an exception
}
}
Difference Between HashMap and Hashtable
HashMap and Hashtable are both part of Java’s Map interface and store information in key-value pairs, but there are critical contrasts between them. Below is a nitty gritty comparison based on different aspects:
Feature | HashMap | Hashtable |
---|---|---|
Synchronization | Not synchronized (not thread-safe). | Synchronized (thread-safe). |
Thread Safety | Not thread-safe; external synchronization required for thread-safe operations. | Thread-safe by default; synchronized methods for concurrent access. |
Null Keys/Values | Allows one null key and multiple null values. | Does not allow null keys or values. Throws NullPointerException if null is used. |
Performance | Faster than Hashtable due to the absence of synchronization overhead. | Slower than HashMap because of synchronization overhead. |
Iterator | Uses a fail-fast iterator. If the map is modified while iterating, a ConcurrentModificationException is thrown. | Uses an enumeration that is not fail-fast. Modifications during iteration do not throw exceptions. |
API | Part of Java 1.2 and later (introduced with the Collections Framework). | Part of the original Java 1.0 API and considered a legacy class. |
Use Case | Suitable for single-threaded applications or when external synchronization is needed. | Suitable for multi-threaded applications where thread safety is required. |
Null Handling | Allows storing null as a key or value. | Does not allow null as a key or value. |
Modern Alternative | Often preferred in modern Java programming. | Hashtable is considered outdated, and ConcurrentHashMap is often used instead for thread-safe operations. |